ACTA FAC. MED. NAISS. 2006; 23 (3): 155-161 |
Original article
COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF THE RESULTS OBTAINED FROM OPERATIVE AND NON-OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF THE TROCHANTER FRACTURES
Momcilo Todorovic1, Zoran Golubovic2,
Predrag Stojiljkovic2, Ivan Micic2, Milovan Zecevic1,
Darko Kostic1, Desimir Mladenovic2, Sasa Karaleic2,
Nina Abbasher2, Zoran Matovic2, Katarina
Kutlesic-Stojanovic2, Aleksandar Visnjic3
1Orthopedic Department of the Health
Center, Cuprija
2Clinic for Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Clinical Center,
Nis
3Public Health Institute, Nis
Sumary
Trochanter fractures rank among severe injuries of the bone tissue and are most often encountered in elderly persons who already have a number of accompanying diseases of cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrine systems. The treatment and healing of such fractures is always a relevant problem because of high frequency and specific population it most often befalls.
In this paper, the results of
the operative and non-operative treatments of the trochanter fractures are
compared. The analyses involved 60 patients with trochanter fractures, older
than the age of sixty. The patients were divided into two groups. The test group
comprised 30 patients treated operatively at the Orthopedic Department of the
Health Centre in Cuprija. The trochanter fractures were stabilized by dynamic
intra-medullar implants (20 patients) and by static extra-medullar implants (10
patients). The control group also included 30 patients who were treated by
supracondillar skeletal extension at the Clinical Centre in Kragujevac. The mean
age of all patients was 70.52 years. The treatment having been completed, the
final results were assessed based on Salvati-Willson's scale, which was modified
by Todorovic and Jevtic. The following parameters were considered: pain, scope
of movements, strength of muscles, support, walking and functioning of the
injured extremity. Comparing the results of operative and non-operative
treatment, it was found that operative treatment gave better results in all the
analyzed parameters (time of mobilization, scope of movements of the injured
hip, muscle strength, functioning of the injured extremity, shortening of the
extremity, frequency of infections). Comparing the results of the operative
treatment by dynamic intra- medullar fixation with the operative treatment by
the rigid extra medullar fixation, we found that the treatment by dynamic
fixation had better effects in all analyzed parameters.
Key words: trochanter fractures, non-operative
treatment, operative treatment