ACTA FAC MED NAISS 2025;42(1):61-73

 

UDC: 616.24-005-037:616.61‑008.6
DOI: 10.5937/afmnai42-52203

Original article

 

Running title: Glomerular Filtration Rate in Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index

Refining Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Embolism: Integrating Glomerular
Filtration Rate and Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index as a Potent Predictor
of Patient Survival

1University of Niš, Faculty of Medicine, Niš, Serbia
2University Clinical Center Niš, Clinic of Cardiology, Niš, Serbia
3Military Medical Academy of Belgrade, Clinic of Cardiology, Belgrade, Serbia
4University Clinical Center Niš,  Clinic of Nephrology, Niš, Serbia
5University of Defence, Medical Faculty of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
6Military Medical Academy, Clinic of Emergency Internal Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
7Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Medical Faculty, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
8University Cardiology Clinic, Intensive Care Unit, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
9University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia
10Institute of Pulmonary Diseases Vojvodina, Novi Sad,Serbia
11University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
12Medical Center Zemun, Clinic of Cardiology, Belgrade, Serbia
13University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Serbia
14Clinical Center Kragujevac,Clinic of Cardiology, Kragujevac, Serbia
15University of Banja Luka, School of Medicine, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
16Clinical Center Banja Luka, Clinic of Cardiology, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
17General Hospital Pančevo, Department for Internal Medicine, Pančevo, Serbia

 

  SUMMARY

 

 

Background/Aim. Patients classified as belonging to simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) class 0 are considered to have low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). Yet, certain laboratory and echocardiographic parameters not accounted for in the sPESI score might suggest a likelihood of worse outcomes in PE cases. This study seeks to determine if the prognostic value of the sPESI score in acute PE can be improved, refined, and optimised by incorporating brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and troponin I (TnI) levels, echocardiographic parameters, or glomerular filtration rate.
Methods. The study encompassed 1,201 consecutive patients diagnosed with PE, confirmed by  multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Upon admission, each patient underwent an echocardiography exam, and blood samples were taken to measure B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), troponin I (TnI), creatinine, and other routine laboratory markers.
Results. The in-hospital mortality rate was 11.5%. The patients were categorized into three groups using the three-level sPESI model: sPESI 0, sPESI 1, and sPESI ≥ 2. Statistically significant differences were found among these groups regarding mortality rates, TnI values, BNP levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the presence of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD). Cox regression analysis identified eGFR as the most reliable predictor of 30-day all-cause mortality [HR 2.24 (CI 1.264-3.969); p = 0.006] across all sPESI categories. However, incorporating TnI, BNP, or RVD did not improve risk prediction beyond the three-level sPESI model.
Conclusion. Renal dysfunction at the time of admission is closely related to an elevated risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute PE. The three-level sPESI score offers a more accurate method for prognostic stratification in these patients.

 Keywords: pulmonary embolism, sPESI score, prognosis

Corresponding author:
Sonja Šalinger
e-mail: sonja.salinger@gmail.com