![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Početna strana
|
Uredništvo
|
Časopis
|
Uputstvo autorima
|
Kodeks u kliničkom i
eksperimentalnom radu |
Kontakt |
|
Home page
|
Editorial board |
About the Journal |
Instructions for
Authors
|
Peer Review Policy
|
Clinical and
Experimental Work Code |
Contact
|
Acta Medica
Medianae Correspondence to: Svetlana Nikolić Institute for Student Health Care Dr Sime Miloševića 6 21000 Novi Sad Srbija E-mail:svetlananikolic81@gmail.com |
Review article UDC: 001.891:174 doi:10.5633/amm.2013.0209
Intellectual Dishonesty in Science
Svetlana Nikolić1, Slađana Jajić2, Ana Vila3, Sunčica Ivanović4
Institute for Student Health Care Novi Sad, Serbia1 Prmary Health Care Center Novi Sad, Serbia2 Center for Children and Youth with Developmental Disabilities, Veternik, Serbia3 College of Health Studies in Ćuprija, Serbia4
The aim of this article is to obtain answers about the most important questions involving dishonesty in science. If we consider scientific work, we have to mention that various forms of errors need to be divided into two groups: reputable and disreputable errors. The third group, called the “grey zone”, includes “cooking” and “trimming”. When we consider the problem of dishonesty in science we should mention the most important question: who and for what reasons commits plagiarism and other forms of intellectual crookedness? Is it for financial benefits or for advancement? It is difficult to say, but it is necessary to use all available remedies to eradicate all forms of intellectual dishonesty, which is hard, especially in biomedical sciences. However, some reputable journals in this field use some special software packages to detect plagiarism. Acta Medica Medianae 2013;52(2):56-60.
Key words: plagiarism, intellectual dishonesty, crookedness
|