Home | Previous Issues | Subscription | Advertistment | Guidelines | Contact ASN |
ACTA
|
Table of Contents for March 2003 • Volume 19 • Number 41 |
IN-CERAM YZ-CUBES ZIRCONIUM OXIDE CERAMICS :
CAD/CAM-ABUTMENTS FOR ALL CERAMIC BRIDGES
A.Bindl* |
Material-technical aspects Y-TCP (Yttria Stabilized Tetragonal Circonia Polycrystal) is considered to be the most successful oxide ceramic for dental-medical application. Outstanding mechanical features of Y-TCP combined with light color and translucence provide fascinating possibilities in modern ceramics restoration. The combination of this new material from firm VITA with SIRONA INLAB SYSTEM opens the futuristic perspectives to its user. Confirmed CAD/CAM technology breaks the technical limits of up to now applied dental ceramic restoration in the maximal aesthetic way. Y-TCP confirmed its excellent biological withstanding by over a 30-year long clinical using for hip joint prosthesis in human body. After passing the sintering procedure suggested by firm VITA, with 3 points it possesses the density of bending to DIN EN ISO 6872 of more than 900 Mpa, that is the one of maximal that can be achieved in dental application of ceramics (Fig. 1)
Combination of high density and extreme
resistance to fractures of Y-TCP, provide the expectations of endurance
and high clinical rate of successful restorations at permanent loading.
Investigation of Matching Accuracy The investigation (Le Tran 2003) carried out in vitro at the Laboratory of Computer Aided Dental Restorations showed very good matching in relation to control method as showed in Table I
Marginal notch width (µm) of the tripartite bridge abutment crownworks (X± SD; n=6) at preparation in procedure In-Ceram TZ Cubes (VITA) / CERES InLab (SIRONA and in procedure CERCON (DEGUSSA) in staircase and notch construction. Control period (min) per construction (X±SD; n=6; Le tran 2003
*P<0,05; ***P<0,001; t-Test Clinical case A 58 year-old patient wanted to replace a metal ceramic crown on tooth 14 (VMC-crown) and metal-ceramic bridge (VMC-bridge) on teeth 15-17 with all-ceramic reconstruction without metal (Fig 4a). The abutment teeth were devitalized. Preparation and Modeling After removal of VMC constructions, old superstructures were replaced with adhesive composite superstructures (Tetric, Ivoclar, Vivadent) and staircase preparation was applied (Fig. 4b). The stair width was 1 mm. Pronounced notched preparations with clearly recognizable edge shaping were also done. Prior to modeling, retracting strands were put (Ultrapac, Ultradent) into gingival suclus. Dental casts were taken twice using Permadin (3M ESPE). Upper jaw position was registered arbitrary according to facial arch (Artex, Girrbach) and transferred on articulator (Artex).
Fabrication of construction, trial, blending (Shading) Cross section model was made and articulated with lower jaw central bite at the dental technical laboratory. Additionally, scan model in plaster cast was made, and matted white with scan spray (Dentaco). The dental technician mounted scan-model on the scan-holder CEREC Inlab apparatus (Sirona) (Fig 5). The abutment axis directions were positioned as vertical as possible on the axis spindle. Then, the scan process was started. The technician made the bridge construction in the ready digital 3D-scan-image, drawing manually only the preparation borders of abutments and entered the thickness of crownworks walls (0,6 mm). Intermediate element and connectors were shaped by simple selection of parameters listed in the menu. The dental technician selected “VITA in-Ceram YZ Cubes” in the menu of materials and placed “VITA in-Ceram YZ Cubes” in the grinding chamber. When calculating the dimensions of the working model, the program has automatically enlarged the bridge construction by 24% to compensate shrinkage at later sintering, and INLAB apparats (Sirona) grinded the bridge construction in accordance with enlargement. The ceramic was sintered into dense structure using specialized furnace (Vita) (Fig. 3). After the removal of temporary bridge, the matched bridge construction was mounted on cleaned tooth abutments and marginal matching was checked. Thermoplastic “Impression Compound” (Kerr) was spread over the construction and center was registered. Shading color selection as well as shading ceramic (Vita D) selection was made by the dental technician.
Final procedure
The dentist tried the shaded bridge, and
checked matching, aproximal contacts and occlusion. Prior to adhesive
insertion, inner surfaces of crown holders were treated with aluminum
oxide (50 Im, 3-4 bars). Literature
1. Bindl A., Mörmann W.H. : An up to
5-year clinical evaluation of posterior In-Ceram CAD/CAM core crowns.
Int. J Prosthodont. 2002;15:451-456. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
...Authors and Reprint Information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A. Bindl Tooth Color Restoration
and Computer Aided Res-toralion Station of the Preventive Dental
Medicine,
|